NPS vs Time-to-depth: What you should look at when analyzing with Stockfish
Por um escritor misterioso
Descrição
What's important: nodes per second or time to depth? Here's how more CPUs impact engines and why higher NPS doesn't mean higher depth for Stockfish.

Is Chessable all it's cracked up to be? An honest review - Chessentials

I composed a reverse puzzle. Stockfish can't find the winning move at depth 50, but a 1000 ELO human can find it in 10 seconds. Black to play and win. : r/chess

NPS - What are the Nodes per Second in Chess Engine Analysis

NPS - What are the Nodes per Second in Chess Engine Analysis

Dissecting Stockfish Part 2: In-Depth Look at a chess engine, by Antoine Champion
Stockfish will analyze a chess position through to (for example) depth 45 and announce a mate in 10. When it reaches depth 56 it finds an improvement, to mate in 9. Why

engines - What is the deepest Stockfish evaluation of the standard initial position that has ever been done? - Chess Stack Exchange

Tablebase for stockfish question - Chess Forums

SmallFish Chess for Stockfish - Updated with iOS 7 - Chess Forums

Stockfish Chess Book Reviews

SmallFish Chess for Stockfish - Updated with iOS 7 - Chess Forums

Why You Should Use Chessify: All Features and Benefits
de
por adulto (o preço varia de acordo com o tamanho do grupo)